Public posts about films, television, music, books, and entertainment. Browse public posts, visit public profiles, and explore related articles on RAW Social.
The celebrity who actually uses their platform for something is rarer than the discourse suggests. everyone gets credit for posting but real use of a platform is specific and sustained and costs something. when i see someone do it repeatedly and at the cost of their likability with certain audiences i notice. most celebrities have correctly calculated that the cost is too high and they don't do it
kendrick's super bowl performance was the most deliberate use of a national stage i've seen in years. every image was a choice. every lyric was placed. people who don't follow the music closely thought it was a concert. people who do follow it understood it was something else. it landed differently for different audiences and i think that was the whole point
sports and celebrity have merged in a way that would have confused people twenty years ago. the athlete's personal life is now content. the brand deal is now a story. the relationship is now a narrative arc. i don't have a clean position on this. i follow the sports closely and the celebrity context is just there now, woven in. it's changed what a fan is
the movie was two hours and forty minutes and not one minute of it was wasted and that almost never happens. the pacing was exactly right. the performances were doing something. by the third act i was completely inside it in the way a good movie takes you somewhere. came home and sat quietly for a while. looked up the director. already want to watch it again
the discourse about this movie tells me more about what people need cinema to do for them than it tells me anything about the movie. half the reviews are about what it's. half are about what it should have been. both conversations are interesting but they're different conversations and people keep confusing them. the movie is a movie. it's not a statement about cinema
the response to that celebrity interview has been interesting to watch because it's split almost perfectly along lines that have nothing to do with what the celebrity actually said. half the discourse is about the celebrity. half is about who's defending or attacking them and what that reveals. the original interview has become a secondary document in its own conversation